Interaction between the Government and Society as a Factor of Social Solidarity in the Context of External Military and Political Aggression: Political and Psychological Aspects
Loading...
Date
Authors
Palahnyuk, Olha
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
DOI
Abstract
ocial solidarity becomes particularly relevant, since stability, mobilization
capacity, and resilience of society largely depend on it. The growing role of civil
society, volunteer movements, and state communication policy highlights the need
for a theoretical understanding of the mechanisms of solidarity. The aim of the
study is to analyze the impact of interaction between the authorities and society
on social solidarity in the context of external threats. The methodological basis
is an interdisciplinary combination of content analysis, comparative analysis of
international experience, and systematization of theoretical approaches in political
psychology. The study reveals that emotional trust, social identifi cation, perceptions
of justice, and citizens’ involvement in socially signifi cant practices play a key
role in maintaining solidarity. The importance of symmetrical interaction between
civic initiatives and state institutions as a condition for sustainable solidarity is
substantiated. A typology of psychological barriers to solidarity and possible
mechanisms for overcoming them is proposed. International experience of solidarity
in crisis situations is summarized and elements relevant to the Ukrainian context
are identifi ed. The practical signifi cance of the study lies in the formulation of
recommendations for state communication policy, support for volunteer initiatives,
the development of indicators of emotional inclusion, and the construction of
long-term strategies for social unity
Description
Citation
Palahnyuk, O. Interaction between the Government and Society as a Factor of Social Solidarity in the Context of External Military and Political Aggression: Political and Psychological Aspects. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala. 2025. № 91. P. 174-191